Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘Street Photography’

A Place in the Sun


Caballeros

The sun and any form of lighting always eluded me. I don’t know about you, I use to fib and slide my way in photography. I mean, I use to point and shoot, and have been very lucky with most of my exposures by using the Sunny 16 rule, F8, and ‘auto mode’ etc..

I have taken courses on photography and cinematography where I had to use complex light meters and shoot photographs and moving pictures that have difficult lighting conditions. I have lit gorgeous table top product shots to streets and buildings. And believe it or not, I would pass them with flying colors. But in reality, I learnt about exposure all through my head and not in my heart and soul. That’s why I would forget it all soon after I learnt it.

So when I sent my friend and critic, Mario, some photos I thought looked okay for feedback, he complained about my poor exposure. Which meant the photos were pure trash. Simple as that.  It was a wake-up call that hit my core. I realized, if I’m going to be a good street photographer, I will have to really understand light and shade through a camera from the bottom of my soul.


Shadow Dancer

I forced myself to learn exposure from my heart. Embrace and feel it from my gut. O bought me a small light meter, a Sekonic L-308s to help. You know what I found? Freedom. Yes. Freedom from my own limits of not understanding how the camera really functioned in the manual mode. Freedom from that stifling “A” mode which I relied on like a useless crutch.


The March

When I don’t have time to go somewhere to shoot the streets (in Los Angeles, you have to drive several miles to shoot anything that’s remotely ‘street’), then I shoot my family and my dogs. But I shoot to learn and practice “light” manipulation. Practice makes perfect! Suddenly, my Leica was no longer a point and shoot but an extension of me and my eye. How cool is that?!


Sounds of the Sun

Steve Huff’s Los Angeles Workshop 2012; SLR Magic Hyperprime 50mm F 0.95 Noktor Lens

Back in January, I had the chance to attend Steve Huff’s Workshop in Los Angeles. I also had a chance to play with the SLR Magic’s Hyperprime 50mm F0.95 Noktor Lens for a couple hours. So this post will be a double fisted review of both!

I’m a fan of Steve Huff’s blog so it was exciting to hear from my friend Todd Hatakeyama, owner of Hatakeyama Gallery, that he was working on getting Steve to come to Los Angeles, to do a workshop. Then Steve actually announced it on his site and followed it up with another announcement that he needed ‘teachers’ or ‘presenters’. I quickly jumped at the chance and offered to present a short history, masters and basics to street photography. Much to my luck and surprise, Steve thought it was a great idea. It secured my spot.

Steve is as affable in person as he is on his blog. He and Todd put together a fun filled weekend of pure photography that involved presentations, hands on learning, shooting and sharing. It’s very different from the last post I made regarding Frank Jackson’s B & W class. There,  it was more the teacher – student relationship. Here, it was like going to photography camp.

To give you an idea, I thought I would just tell you what we did. So here goes:

DAY ONE  started Friday, late afternoon with a meet and greet at Hatakeyama Gallery. Todd created a kind of “hot spot” or “home base” where photographers can gather and hang (there’s couches, TV and refrigerator :-)).  His gallery doubles as workshop space in the basement which is adjacent to studio shooting space. He’s working on expanding it to include a permanent workshop/classroom and dark room lab. You can also buy  basic lighting and camera equipment through his store,  Simple Studio Lighting, which occupies the main street level storefront. So basically a one stop photography environment.

30 attendees from around the country and Australia attended. Half of us had Leicas (film and digital) while the others had a variety ranging from Canons, NEX-7 to Fuji x100. It was also great to meet Ashwin Rao after reading his many posts.

The first presenter was Andrew Chan of SLR Magic, who introduced his new Hyperprime 50mm F 0.95 Noktor lens, the challenger to Leica’s Noctilux 50mm F 0.95. He brought 4 prototypes for the attendees to play with to get some feedback. And there were several points Andrew needed to fix which he said he would.

We took the lenses out for a spin around the neighborhood of downtown Los Angeles. Since it was night time, I decided to use the Ricoh GXR with the M-Mount to test out the Hyperprime.The results were pretty impressive.

Hyperprime on Steve’s M9-P

I shot the following two pictures just before we left for the walk to test the Hyperprime against the Noctilux. I did not edit the pictures. It’s just a jpeg of the raw images as is.

SLR Magic Hyperprime

Leica Noctilux

You can see, sharpness is pretty much on par between the two.  The colors of the Hyperprime are a touch on the blue and cool side. While the Noctilux has warmer tones. There is more contrast in the Hyperprime image than the Noctilux. Rendering for both look great.  The bokeh is lovely and smooth on both.

Photo by Ashwin Rao (See the Hyperprime on my Ricoh and on Steve’s Leica. Andrew is in the middle.)

I did notice that the Hyperprime lens was a touch loose on the M-mounting ring of my Ricoh. Andrew told me that it was quite normal. It did not affect the images. Although, I’m not sure if I felt better hearing that.

Physically, the Hyperprime is longer and heavier at 975 grams, than the Noctilux which weighs 700 grams. And I can personally attest to its ruggedness. While we were walking the streets the weight of the Hyperprime caused the standard issue Ricoh strap to loosen and the whole camera fell on the concrete pavement.  (Ouch!) When I heard the THUD, my heart stopped. I was horrified to say the least. It was loud enough that everyone came over to see that the thick lens hood took a small dent but the lens and camera was in perfect condition. Thank goodness, Andrew was all gracious and that it was a prototype and not a final production model. Luckily I didn’t have to pay for its replacement. 🙂

The Leica Noctilux Aspherical has 8 elements, 9 aperture blades and focuses to 1.0 meter.The

Hyperprime has 12 lens elements, 12 aperture blades and focuses to 0.7 meters ( equivalent of an f/0.92 aperture at f/0.95).

Andrew told me the Hyperprime glass comes from China as well as Schott in Germany because not all Chinese glass can perform at the their high quality expectations. However, the housing and all other materials come from China. They assemble in China and Hong Kong. To maintain quality control, the calibration is done entirely in Hong Kong. The combination helps keep the cost down and the quality up.

SLR Magic is committed to making this lens to work for many cameras other than Leica. So you can also get it with a Canon EF Mount, Nikon F Mount or Four Thirds Mount. But the coolest of all, the PL Cinema Mount. You can shoot this with movie cameras too!

Now, it’s hard for me to give a true verdict for the Hyperprime because I only had it for a couple hours. And from other people’s reviews of this lens, I can see the day time shots look pretty good. But at this point, I really still prefer the Noctilux. I hate to carry heavy elements, so the added weight and size of the Hyperprime is already a deterrent (every gram counts with me). However, I can say that if you can’t afford the Noctilux, the Hyperprime is an excellent alternative at half the price.

UPDATE: OCTOBER 8, 2012

Since my last update and updates by other blogs and websites, there has been quite a lot of commotion and out-of-context accusations in forums and Facebook regarding the causes, claims and remedies of SLR Magic’s 50mm F0.95 Hyperprime lens, which I gave a first impression review here. As a result, lots of finger pointing and heated exchanges have taken place between SLR Magic and some disgruntled test users regarding the pre-production models. So it’s time to update and hopefully put all issues to rest.

To provide an equal forum, I asked Andrew Chan at SLR Magic some pointed questions. He wrote back at length giving me detailed explanations. Here is Andrew’s response to my questions. I have only replaced names with initials:

1) So it is not clear to me, as there are different claims. Were the lenses that everyone in the tester program got, a pre-production model or a first short run production model?

Check the email you received before for the lens. All LA workshop lenses were pre-production lenses. Only D’s lens had a loose ring and only S’s lens had a mount that need to be replaced. Ever since their lenses the other customers have no loose ring issues or frame line issue. There was never a sho[r]t run production. It was just pre-production that had a stealth version then the production version that is either in green or in black.

2) You claim that some of the performance issues of the pre-production models were caused by poor packaging, which you have since changed- So, with the new packaging, do you have any more issues with loose rings and not focusing at infinity or any other problems?

The new packaging resolved all the issues. Only two people had issues with shipping. M’s was the first person who received the lens and we noticed the issue. We told D to wait since we need to improve the shipping materials but he said he will take a risk since he wants to use it to shoot a wedding that cannot wait. If we did not ship to him by his request there would have been no issues. T sent his lens to his buyer with no issues in our new packaging. We sent M his serviced lens that took one day turnaround time in the new packaging and he had no issues either.

3) So after the ‘testing’ period, have you resolved all of the lens problems? Can you say that your lens performs exactly how you and your team have envisioned it now?

The lens is performing fine. No one at Photokina had issues apart from three people. Two of them was due to human error as they cannot even constantly take accurate photos against a focus chart with Leica camera and Leica lens. The last person had a back focusing camera. He tested his own Voigtlander lens and Leica Camera. His lens is a 1.2 and a 35mm so there was more DOF and backfocus did not matter to him before. Someone did come with a Noctilux 0.95. His lens has very slight back focus that is within tolerance but he cannot constantly take photos on the spot with our chart. He was also comparing the Noct at 1m with the HyperPrime at 0.7m with different DOF properties.

The lens had always perform as we envisioned but what we did not expect was the amou[n]t of camera error and human error involved on the consumers end. When face to face we can test right on the spot. When by mail order it is difficult and with what everyone has read on the internet they automatically feel it is the lens that has issues.

Every lens returned has no focus issues. We have customers not using magnifiers for assist or needing to use diopters that may not be 100% perfect for their eyes and it is a difficult situation for us. To see clearly we need to stack two multipliers so it is impossible to shoot 100% accurate with no assistance. Erwin Putts also said to see 0.95 accurately it helps to have more than one magnifier.

4) When the customer wants a refund within a customary period, are you willing to refund?

Discounted Pre-production lenses had no refund policy as stated in the email. Regular customers may refund in one month only if there is a serious issue with the lens that cannot be repaired or exchanged. Reasons we received was I want to save up for the new Leica M instead, or bought three other Leica lenses this month, or my dealer called me and my Noctilux is in and I want to return, or I found a 50mm Summilux and I need money now. Those are NOT valid return reasons. The only one we felt was decent was he had an unexpected child and cannot afford to commit to the lens at this time. Strictly speaking that is not a valid reason but from the heart that is ok as it is a real financial situation. DA originally cancelled because all his gear was stolen and he need to use his money to get a new camera but he kept his order at the end by changing the LM order to CINE order. We tend to only accept cancellations or refund due to real urgency and not because of another Leica lens purchase. They can refund the Leica gear instead as it was the more recent purchase.

5) What is the expected turnaround in email correspondence between a customer and SLR Magic?

As F said, sometimes you cannot respond to everyone at once. That is totally true. We are a small company and apart from dealing with extremely complicated technical questions I also have to be in charge of the production line. Some on the internet complained we do not respond to emails. Many listed to him. Did he mention he emailed us at 11pm Hong Kong time on Sat and filed a complaint to us on Sunday afternoon? Those are not even our work hours. Leica in Hong Kong are closed on Sat and Sun as well. No one can respond so quickly. I have emailed S. K. from Leica before that is in charge of Leica Asia region. 4 months ago I emailed him and he said he is on business trip and till now there is no reply. The second time I emailed him was a week ago to order the Leica M and he did not respond to me ever and got another customer rep to reply to me a week afterwards. Even Leica company cannot reply immediately and they are a lot larger than us.

We usually respond in 1-5 business days depending on the difficulty of the question. If it is about Toy Lenses we respond in 1 day. if it is about RF lens then usually only I respond and it takes 5 business days. As you can see I typed a lot on facebook on this issue. I have over 28 emails with each Leica lens customer ever since the rumour mill.

6) Are you now selling the full production model?

Yes and we make the lens as a concept lens. We planned to have 10 lenses a month but ever since the rumor mill I was stuck with many emails to attend to and out lens makers were stuck with many people returning lenses for check up and re check up again that would not solve any issue as focus issues were due to human error and not lens error. The rumor mill caused a delay dropping production speed to 2-3 lenses per month only. Thus, S’ claim for dozens of people having issues is not possible as we don’t make so many lenses.

END UPDATE

UPDATE: July 14, 2012

Since my brief review of the prototype here, a series of first production models were bought by “testers” for around 60% of the retail price in exchange for feedback. And apparently, the lens has failed in its performance. I saw first hand a loose ring on a friend’s lens. And Facebook is now seeing many complaints regarding the len’s inability to focus at infinity in addition to loose rings.SLR MAGic has been blaming it on packaging in shipping, even when there was no shipping involved. Because of the commotion, Steve Huff, who raved unusually much about the lens and pushed for people to buy and check it out quite heavily on his site,  placed an update asking people to hold off on buying. Although, he says his lens is still okay. You can read his post here.

To add salt to the wound, the complaints don’t end with lens performance. It continues with bad or near non-existent customer service and rather nasty return policy for those who have cancelled pre-orders that have not shipped.

What a shame. SLR Magic is just ruining it’s potential as legitimate brand when it shuns its first most devoted and even forgiving customers. If SLR Magic wants to stay in business, it needs to do major damage control by  immediately offering full refunds to all those who cancelled pre-orders and provide a prompt and complete warranty service  or full refund option for those who already have it. In other words, SLR Magic needs to own up and suck it up.

END UPDATE


DAY TWO started off with a presentation by Jay Bartlett, a commercial portrait and fashion photographer here in Los Angeles. He gave us some basic tips on how to shoot portraits, followed by a hands-on studio model shoot. He brought in a professional model Jade Corinne, and professional make-up artist Marjorie Bartlett, who is also his wife (very handy). Jay was very cool. He explained to us why he set up the lighting the way he did and helped us to adjust our cameras to achieve the look we wanted. I had a ball shooting with strobes and a model. Everyone else did too.

I found out how difficult it is to shoot fashion  and models. The pose, facial expression and emotion is everything. But to get the model to look natural is really hard. So many of the shots I did made the model look like a manquin. The ones here are the best from a ton of shots.

Oh, and I finally learnt how to use my Sekonic light meter.  Thanks to Jay’s tutelage.

After the model shoot, we all walked a couple miles to Little Tokyo where we had a buffet lunch. Steve was a good host. You can ask about all sorts of photography questions and Steve gives you his opinion. We all sat together and talked ‘shop” and got to know the attendees as well. On the way there and back we got some street shooting in. This time I did not have the Hyperprime so others could try it out too.

We returned to the gallery to see a presentation of impressive work by Sean Armenta, another fashion photography based here in Los Angeles. It was followed by Ashwin Rao, who gave a talk about  how he built his on-line presence with examples of his photos. Afterwards, some of the attendees had dinner with Steve, but I had to take off. I heard they had a great time.

DAY THREE started with my presentation of the history of street photography, the masters, contemporary and the basics of street photography. And yes, I squeezed in a little shameless self promotion. 🙂 Jeff Garlin, the comedian/actor of Curb Your Enthusiasm fame, popped in early to listen to my presentation. Which he told me he liked by the way. 🙂  After my schtick, the true highlight of the day was when he did a “street photographer’s” stand-up routine for about 30 minutes. Everyone laughed their heads off. To all those who don’t know, Jeff is a huge street photography and a Leica fanatic. He is also a street photographer himself but is too shy to show his work. Hopefully he’ll reveal his art one day.  But for now, he is the producer of the Vivian Maier documentary which John Maloof will direct.

Jeff Garlin

After the laughs, we went to a Mexican restaurant nearby for lunch.  We shot some more on the streets and came back to the gallery to edit our photos. Then we presented our best 3 street images from the weekend. There was a lot of talent amongst the attendees, including first timers. Afterwards, some of the attendees went to dinner again with Steve. Looks like they had a good time.

The only complaint I have is that there was no water left after the first half of the second day and the third day. I know it’s a small, even petty thing but I had to run out and get water from the corner store up the street. I think it was because everyone got so involved into the workshop that it was simply forgotten.

Otherwise, I recommend this workshop to anyone who wants to get in on the know of new equipment, learn new techniques and be part of a street photography community.  I mentioned at the start of this post, it’s like going to photography camp. Like one big hangout. The only thing with this camp, there’s no sleep over. However, you make friends with a lot of like-minded people, who are all interested in the same thing as you. Community is really the most valuable thing you walk away with more than anything else. It’s like being a part of a club. In our case, we are now on Facebook as a group, constantly sharing and critiquing each other. Whenever there’s a question or some cool thing to share, we all get to see and talk about it. Steve is part of the group as well and puts in his two cents all the time. Even Andrew at SLR Magic is in the group. And whenever anyone wants to go shooting, we just post in FB that we’re in town and we meet up at Hatakeyama Gallery.

I’ve linked very one’s websites with their name if you wish to find out more info on them.

#3 JOHN GOLDSMITH, Vancouver Street Photographer


Leica Liker is excited to introduce our # 3 guest, John Goldsmith, an American street photographer, now living in Vancouver, Canada.

John came to us as a photography ‘insider’, by way of his first job making emulsions in a film lab using a squeegee and silver chloride. A bonafide chemist who studied photons for his masters degree, he also took lessons on negative film developing. So it was natural that he carried a camera and eventually became a photographer.


What attracted me to John’s photographs is this sense of sleek modernism. His images have a chemistry that is between shimmering new light and young cities that don’t have deep roots. Or maybe it’s that he grew up in Detroit, Michigan, a city that spawned from a once modern age of transportation.


John talks of ‘theater’. When you study his photographs, they bring a distance to the image that feels like a scientist studying its subject. And true to his scientific roots, his ‘theater’ often poses more questions than give any answers. And that’s what he aims for when he shoots. This constant questioning makes the photographs alluring – You want to find out more about the story behind the picture.

This is my interview with JOHN GOLDSMITH:

Nick Name: Waxy
Currently living in: Vancouver, Canada
Motto: Don’t have one.
Profession/Job: Professional Photographer

Street Photographer since: 2006
Websites: www.johngoldsmithphotography.com and www.twitter.com/#!/jogofoto/
Organizations or Group: Strange.rs and Street Photographers

Favorite Street Camera & Lens: Canon 5DMkII + Canon 17-40mm f/4 lens
Back-up Street Camera & Lens: iPhone 3Gs
Favorite photography gadget: The J-strap – a handy camera strap custom made by my friend Justin Barnes.
Favorite street food: Coffee. Vancouver has no shortage of great cafes. Espressos. Pour-overs. You name it. If it’s made well, I’ll drink it, hot or cold but I prefer lukewarm.

Do you listen to music while shooting? Only if I’m using my iPhone. Otherwise, never.
Favorite music when shooting and/or editing Photos: Usually I’m in my own no-music zone but with my recent project I’ve taken to the Talking Heads. Speaking of which, the intro to ‘Psycho Killer,’ as my wife pointed out, is the same as the opening to the Fraggle Rock theme song. I apologize if any of your readers like the Talking Heads because they will never think of Psycho Killer in quite the same as they did.
Favorite photo software: Adobe Lightroom 4. It’s the only software that I believe is offered at a fair market value and every photographer should use it. I don’t say that about many things.

3 Favorite Master Photographers: Alex Webb, Trent Parke and Garry Winogrand.
3 Favorite Contemporary Photographers: There are so many deserving photographers making incredible photographic images today that having to choose just three seems an impossible task. What I’ll say is that Flickr’s HCSP group has helped produce and introduced me to some of the most amazing contemporary street photographers around. Personally, I’ll be forever thankful for it’s impact on me and my photography.

Which 3 photographers’ prints do you own? Sadly, I don’t even have three prints, let alone two, from other photographers. It’s something that I want to change. I’ve even gone so far to coordinate with other photographers to swap prints but none of us have committed ourselves to getting to the post office. But by year’s end, I am going to make this happen. But honestly, lately I’m more into the idea of book swapping. Photographers should publish more books.

I do, however, have a very nice black white print that my wife purchased for me from a student at Parsons (New School, NYC). My wife was a doctoral student at the time and there was an art show, if I recall. Sadly, when I got the print there was no name associated with it. Don’t photographers sign their prints anymore? So even though I keep it front and center in our home, and consider what it shows on most days of the week, I don’t know who made it. Not only should photographers make more books but they should use some sort of signature or ‘chop.’ Along with the democracy of everything, which is a good thing, there seems to be this nonsensical idea that signing or even entitling a work somehow makes it bourgeois.

Color or Black and White? Definitively color. But I think photographers should shake up their approach now and then, if not for the challenge alone, then to keep from becoming static. In a 2010 public lecture, Fred Herzog, who has become a bit of a legend in Vancouver and now elsewhere, said: “You have to take risks. You have to take risks even now. And if you go out, and you take only safe pictures, you have not achieved anything. You have to make a hole for yourself every day you go out and you take 50 pictures, at least a few of them have to be risky. I mean technically risky. You have to do something you have never done before.”

When I was studying for my Masters in Chemistry, I remember hearing that academics change their research area every 10 years. Photographers should do this, too. There is not only the subject matter that’s important to a story but an aesthetic as well. They form a symbiotic relationship and I don’t think either can survive very well on their own, or at least, they survive better together. Trent Parke is very good at this and he chooses the format by project to better describe his narratives. Few photographers take on this challenge. Maybe they get sucked into forever improving their portfolio, or something, but there is more to photography than just that.

Shoot Film or Digital? Ha. Digital. Though I learned to use film first. My first thought is as a professional photographer I would never shoot a wedding or event on film. It would be a nightmare – scanning, colour correcting, and archiving. No thank you! Consistency of the process and product between my personal and professional work is vitally important to me and so shooting digital carries over to my personal work. Regardless, the differences between film and digital aesthetics are shrinking. Even if they may never be the same, they both have their place for the time being.

Additionally, in a former life as a research chemist, I used to not only process my own negatives but I literally manufactured film. Needless to say, I know my way around the darkroom. But there was a time, shortly after my twin daughters were born when. I took some newly exposed negs and was prepared to develop them. I wasn’t in the right mindset and, in retrospect, I knew it. Call it a lack of sleep or some other parental excuse. Regardless, even as a chemist who was trained to triple-check the chemicals, I first dumped fixer right into the pot. That was it. I immediately recognized the mistake and tried to wash them and reprocess them but it was far too late. Those pictures, and whatever was on them, were gone. No image, not even a latent one, was left. That was the last time I processed my own negatives. If it weren’t for a stash of film archives, I’d probably also sell my very nice scanner. I hear they are as good as gold these days.

If Film, what type of negative? I used to like several color films including Portra, Velvia and Superia. I don’t really have a favorite of those but my favorite monochrome is without a doubt Neopan 400 pushed two stops.
Is there a special time of the day you like to shoot or is any time good? Any time of day works. I find it more difficult these days just because I seem to be getting busier with both work and family. It’s rare now that I get to shoot street which is partly how I drifted onto a new project that I’ll discuss a bit later. My preference, however, is strong but somewhat oblique sunshine.

Why did you choose Street Photography and not another form of photography or stamp collecting? Probably like most boys (and maybe girls, too) in and around Detroit, I wanted to be a car designer. I used to scribble and scratch futuristic designs on paper. When I went to university, I began taking classes in industrial design. We had a field trip to a local Ford factory. What I remember is a visceral dismay of the industry where factories could easily replace Mordor from Lord of the Rings – shakey metal stairs in pitch darkness with flaming infernos in the distance. That was no place for me as some hopeful kid.

But as far as why Street Photography – I enjoy walking with a camera. I enjoy navigating the landscape and interacting with people, even if the latter only lasts for an instant. I also like psychology, sociology, and philosophy and maybe street photography juggles those three disciplines to my satisfaction.

What motivates you to photograph the streets? Even though imagery from street photography leans to a fiction account, it’s my wanting to understand people that drives me. While people tell me I’m a good writer, I don’t usually have the patience to put pen to paper. Taking pictures is quicker and is more descriptive for my purpose. It’s a bit like Slim’s Table, I suppose, if there are any sociologists out there. It’s descriptive. A variety of people come into this cafeteria and share what they have, even if only for an instant. Having access to so many individuals could prove to be quite daunting with any other method than photography.

Is Street Photography an obsession? It started as an obsession but now I have family so there’s less time. With children, I can’t carry as much as I used to. So now I want to simplify.
Are you a lone shooter or do you like shooting with friends or a group? I love to shoot with other people. I take people on photowalks all the time. Since 2005, when I first got onto Flickr, I was able to get a lot of people involved in trips to see Fred Herzog’s exhibits. I have children and spend a lot of time with them. So I’m not distracted by other people. Fortunately my wife appreciates what I’m doing here.

Favorite street photography city: Well, cities are exciting but I’m happy to be anywhere with a camera. I could be on a farm and still enjoy making the same kinds of pictures, although I’m an urbanite at heart. I would say, however, that “the city” is almost the problem for street photography because many people are taking the same kinds of photos that have existed for a half century or more. People are drawn to a certain edginess but I don’t think most people realize that what they are capturing doesn’t carry over well a flat picture. They’d be better off not trying to replicate what’s been done and to turn the camera on their own family and friends. That sort of access can help create a certain uniqueness that nobody else could replicate. But, if I had to choose one place I’ve experiences, Sydney, Australia has to be the most agreeable with the aesthetic that’s currently driving my street photography. But Melbourne is a close second – and they have better cafes.

What inspires your photography? Certainly the work of other photographers drives me. But I like philosophy, too, even though I have no formal training. Fortunately my wife does and so she gives me some guidance. That’s a dangerous thing – an armchair philosopher! Now that I no longer practice chemistry, I wish I would have concentrated in a different discipline, a field of study more pertinent to my current passion. But we can’t predict how our lives will move and being a scientist suited me then and hopefully now by strengthening my reasoning skills. At least, that’s what my friend always tells me.

What do you look for in a good photograph? Getting back to your earlier question about which prints are on my wall, I admit that one of the reasons I don’t have more is that I’m frightfully picky about art and design. The print I mentioned earlier from the New School keeps me coming back. I look at it frequently and I never get bored. Those are the photographs I want on my wall. The ones with multiple focal points, tension and questions. I’m leaning more strongly than ever to the “incomplete” photograph as David Alan Harvey calls it. The photo, which forces the viewer to add their own opinion. The boring shots are the ones that tell you exactly what you’re seeing and add nothing more. Personally, I’d rather have a series on the wall that rotates than a line of single shots. That’s why I wish photographers would focus on books. They are more complex. And, much more affordable!

How do you go about shooting a street photograph? I believe good photographs happen everywhere. I’m always looking around, keeping my eyes open for anything and everything. But I don’t have much patience to wait. 3-5 minutes wait is tops with very few exceptions. By waiting you may or may not get the shot. I usually just follow my instinct. For instance, the photograph with the five guys walking in suits. I was watching the Alec Sloth exhibit with my family. The space was nice and interesting. I saw the guys and followed them around a bit. I’m not methodical, but more spontaneous.

I want to be able to make a shot work in any place. I do a lot of environmental shots. When I do, I plant myself. It is like a game to get all the lines and elements together. For instance, the shot of the woman walking with the umbrella behind her is one of my best. That was a waiting game to get people to fit in.

Yet on the other hand, the shot with 4 people looking out the window in a highrise. It’s a view outside my window. It just happened one day that they all looked out the window. These shots can happen anywhere is what I’m saying.

When you compose, what are you looking for? It’s really about balance. My shots are less formal with regard to formal composition. Garry Winogrand says, ‘photography is not reality, it is light on paper’. I agree with him. It’s about the balance between, light, dark and color. To find balance, I often look at black spots in the shot as mass or gravity, or weight. I use it to frame light and color. They float within the weight of the frame.
Best 3 tips for shooting the streets:
1) Know your camera.
2) Wear good walking shoes. Then,
3) Take the train to the end of the line and walk home while taking pictures. Doing that last part was just about the best $3 I ever spent.

Best single advice on how to improve your work: My Grandma Mary (b. 1906) was told by her mother that if everyone was running towards an emergency, she should turnaround and go in the other direction. One day, I’m told, a number of people rushed towards the flames and toxic smoke of a burning hospital – to gawk. She, in turn, did what her mother told her and went straight home. As it happens, many people got sick from the fumes. Heroes aside, I assume that many of those people just wanted to watch the events unfold. But those are not the pictures I’m seeking. Gawking at what’s obvious can create obvious pictures. Sometimes just turning your back to the obvious thing will create a more interesting photograph. Think of those Olympic photos where all of the photographers were forced to sit in the same box and snap away for three hours. Trust me, you don’t want those pictures anymore than I do.

Best single advice on how to edit your work: You have to start with a theme. I don’t think a good edit can come from just pictures themselves. You have to have an idea. Again, Fred Herzog says it best:
“Who says I didn’t learn a lot from the movies? Absolutely. You know, what we put into our pictures is not a smart idea. What we put into our pictures is our whole life and our whole intellectual discourse. Everything we know and everything we have done and everything that’s in our history goes into every single picture we take. Have you ever thought of that? That’s how it is.”

Even a portfolio can have a theme. But you have to start somewhere. After that, find a photographer/editor you trust to help review your work. You can’t do this in a vacuum. Go and read John Dewey’s ‘Art as Experience’ where he talks about art and how a vital aspect of it is how the viewer interprets the work. A photographer cannot begin to imagine all of the ways others will see their own pictures or how they coexist. How many times has someone pointed out something in your own work that you did not see for yourself?

Best single advice for someone who wants to get into street photography: Get a camera. Get any camera that allows you to shoot without frustration. Making pictures should be as simple as possible. If you can’t see the viewscreen because the sun’s too bright or the camera isn’t adjustable to your liking, you won’t enjoy the experience and you won’t connect to the strangers in the street. Ultimately, you won’t make good pictures or a good edit. This genre is frustrating enough because of its inherent challenges. One doesn’t need a camera to make it more troublesome.

Also, forget about one hit wonders, grand slams and slam dunks. Those shots will come but it’s better to begin thinking of ideas. These can come from books, music, or other people’s photographs. The photo just represents the art but it’s not all of it.

What’s the best moment in your street photography career? Having two prints, one of which is A1 format, accepted into the Head On Photo Festival. I can’t wait til this Summer. If only I could return to Australia to actually see the print in the exhibit!
What’s the worst moment in your street photography career? Honestly, I can’t think of any. I’ve never had any serious run-ins with angry people. If a moment doesn’t go my way, I won’t get bogged down. Carry on, I say For anyone who has taken as many street photographs as I have, they know that even the shot’s that feel right often are not. You might suspect but you can’t know that a shot works until you have the time to study it. If one could really evaluate a photograph that quickly, it probably wouldn’t remain interesting for very long even as a print.

Also, I don’t believe there is any one single moment that needs a picture taken, barring maybe a wedding kiss. There are a lots of photos happening everywhere and all the time. The trick is becoming aware enough to your surroundings and then be quick enough respond. But if you miss it, there’s no reason to fret it – from a probability perspective, the shot probably wouldn’t have been good anyway. Like I said: move on.

What projects are you working on? In 2011, I spent nearly 6 months in Australia. During that time I was developing a project called “Flat White Short Black.” I’ve spent many hours thinking about it, editing the work and researching book design. I’ve made a few test prints and hopefully I’ll publish it by the year’s end. It’s a long process which can be frustrating at times. But also don’t think long term projects should be rushed.
Where do you want to be in 5 years with regard to street photography? Until last year, I mostly concentrated on single shots. While there are themes, I would like to move into more project-based work. I’m already going down that road as I mentioned above. I recently finished working on what I consider my most exciting work to date. It’s based on street photography but it’s rooted in conceptual photography. The idea is based on impermanence. It’s titled ‘Drop Out of Art School’. Schedule to launch on Strange.rs on May 1. The book launch is scheduled for June 1. There’s a bit of a teaser here.


Congratulations on your upcoming exhibition at the Head On Photo Festival. Are there other exhibitions planned in the future? Beyond Head On, I have nothing planned as far as exhibitions are concerned. But I have two books in the works, as I previously mentioned. That said, my home is in an 80-unit work-live artists’ residence. Along with a studio, we have a massive gallery that’s as big and beautiful as any private exhibition space in the city. It’s absolutely stunning. What’s tragic is that the gallery has been used maybe once in 12 years! I’m planning to change that. At our recent general meeting, I took on a post with the newly designated art committee. I can’t wait to get started! Even better is that I can use the space, not only art shows but, for photography education classes which I plan to begin this summer.

Leica Liker thanks John for sharing detailed thoughts and experience with us. We will definitely revisit him again.
You can check out John’s gear in Liker Bags’n Gear here.